Recent Entries
- Case study: hitting the Billboard charts by free online streaming of the album
- ABC Radio National: Discussion on the future of influence
- The future of social networks and television distribution channels
- The emergence of mobile augmented reality
- Top Twitterers: US, Canada, Norway, Australia, UK, New Zealand
- Keynote: Transforming Aged Care with Technology
- Quick review of TEDxAdvance on Future of the Enterprise
- Q&A: Twitter’s retention rates: will Twitter be pervasive or a niche app?
- Availability of talent drives entrepreneurial innovation – the story of Silicon Valley unemployment
- Six key insights into the future of the Direct Selling Industry
« Previous Entry | Future Exploration Network Blog | Next Entry »
Future Exploration Network Blog
Thinking usefully about the future
The latest issue of Business 2.0 has an interesting piece on how the Institute for the Future (IFTF), one of the oldest future-watching organizations, is creating “artifacts from the future” – physical manifestations of things that may come to pass – to help its clients understand the convergence of current trends and their impact. The article says that IFTF’s clients don’t have the time or mindspace to trawl through the annual 10 year forecasts that are its trademark, thus the creation of more tangible outputs. Alex Soojung-Kim Pang of IFTF believes its clients’ supposed lack of inclination to read reports is overblown, but there is no question that some of the IFTF’s outputs are pretty cognitively dense, and we can all see the attention span of senior executives whittling away year by year. Future Exploration Network will be applying a wide variety of ways of engaging our clients with new ideas. Richard and I, in a project last year helping a major bank develop long-term strategies, used newspapers mocked up with possible headlines for 5-10 years hence to stimulate discussions and new ideas. If we’d had the budget, we would have created one or more “bank branches of the future” that executives could experience for themselves. There is no question that rigor is needed in exploring fundamental trends and how they might play out, but time-impoverished executives often need a more direct approach to provoke them out of their everyday pressures.