Recent Entries
- Web 2.0 and human resources – who should drive Web 2.0 initiatives in the organization?
- Early insights from the Top 100 Australian Web 2.0 Applications list
- Registrations now open for Top 100 Australian Web 2.0 Applications Launch Event
- Enterprise 2.0 in Financial Services: upcoming keynote
- Interview on SkyBusiness: Facebook And Other Social Networking Sites Can Be Beneficial For Corporations
- Social networks in organizations: balancing risk, reward, and transparency
- More media coverage of Enterprise 2.0 Executive Forum
- Enterprise Twitter – or how to tap social networks for expertise without using email
- Video conversation with Euan Semple on Enterprise 2.0 governance and peer-to-peer
- Is business yet to harness Web 2.0, or not yet willing to talk about it?
Platinum Sponsor
Gold Sponsor
Partners
Media Partners
« Previous Entry | Enterprise 2.0 Executive Forum Blog | Next Entry »
Enterprise 2.0 Executive Forum Blog
Table Notes: Learning 2.0
What do we want to cover;
Newcastle Uni; Too much face to face. Informal learning with quality.
Sharing.
Frank Team - extending learning after a course. Sharing more. Alumni.
NAB - changing culture from spoon fed to self-serving.
IBM and personal interest (doctorate) - informal learning.
Fostering innovation.
Microsoft - training. anyone can be a trainer - publish courses.
Microsoft - collaborative learning. Open. Sharing, virtual teams.
Victoria University - decentralised management.
Rough Notes:
Using media - video, audio cast.
User ratings.
Execs doing briefings.
Tough when its compliance. I.e. have to go.
People will find it if they need it to help with their jobs.
And you can't force people. They need to want to learn. Can't forcefeed.
Who is the driver of the training.
Transition point - have a knowledge broker who takes the information and sending it around.
They have to get to the point Nathan mentioned which was everyone has access to everything and people contribute by doing their jobs.
KM broker is a referee not a 'churner' of content. Not a facilitator.
How do you get started?
How do you get it into the workflow?
Tough to make a half step.
Is a wiki just a document reposititory?
Finding stuff;
Categories and nav is old school.
Need to do tagging, but everyone uses different terms.
Cult of the Amatuer is it good or bad?
Newcastle Uni; Too much face to face. Informal learning with quality.
Sharing.
Frank Team - extending learning after a course. Sharing more. Alumni.
NAB - changing culture from spoon fed to self-serving.
IBM and personal interest (doctorate) - informal learning.
Fostering innovation.
Microsoft - training. anyone can be a trainer - publish courses.
Microsoft - collaborative learning. Open. Sharing, virtual teams.
Victoria University - decentralised management.
Rough Notes:
Using media - video, audio cast.
User ratings.
Execs doing briefings.
Tough when its compliance. I.e. have to go.
People will find it if they need it to help with their jobs.
And you can't force people. They need to want to learn. Can't forcefeed.
Who is the driver of the training.
Transition point - have a knowledge broker who takes the information and sending it around.
They have to get to the point Nathan mentioned which was everyone has access to everything and people contribute by doing their jobs.
KM broker is a referee not a 'churner' of content. Not a facilitator.
How do you get started?
How do you get it into the workflow?
Tough to make a half step.
Is a wiki just a document reposititory?
Finding stuff;
Categories and nav is old school.
Need to do tagging, but everyone uses different terms.
Cult of the Amatuer is it good or bad?
Thanks for copying these notes. I was a little disappointed that this table was full, but still got value from the table that was merged from 3 others! True collaboration!
Was there any consensus that informal learning approaches and learner drive rather than "training-push" style can work in corporate Australia?